Thursday, December 17, 2009
Trivani Spotlight
Take a look at some of the people Trivani has helped.
This one warms my heart. :)
Saturday, December 5, 2009
Crime and Punishment: A Comparitive Analysis of American vs. Foreign Justice
I am thinking specifically of Amanda Knox and Devon Hollahan. Amanda Knox- the girl that most Americans seem to believe was framed (or at least abused) by the Italian police and courts. I can hear every parent in American warning their kids about the dangers of non-American judicial systems. Systems where, like in most countries outside our borders, a person is guilty until proven innocent.
Now I could rattle off lists of complaints and problems with the U.S. Judicial system, our courts, our government, and American legal mores. But the fact of the matter is, I have nothing to complain about comparatively! Am I being held under house arrest, just because I believe in freedom and democracy like Aung San Suu Kyi? Man I am glad I do not live in Burma...
Or am I being held, like Amanda is, in a foreign jail for over 2 years, for a crime I may or may not have committed? Now that Amanda was found guilty, what does that say about American justice vs. international justice? Could Americans, just for being American, be targeted as the harbingers of crime?
What about in the case of Devon Hollahan? I read about his case when my friend who is teaching English abroad in the Czech Republic starting posting that one of her fellow American teachers had gone missing during a weekend trip to Frankfort. What is odd about the case of Devon is that he literally vanished into thin air. One minute he was standing next to his friend, and the next minute he was gone. Does that happen in America? Well, yes. Of course it happens.
But why we hear about people like Amanda and Devon is because we expect and understand that there is crime in America and we believe (for the most part) that the American judicial system will punish criminals and protect victims. We do not believe, I would argue, that other countries can and will do the same. This also makes me think of the case of Madeleine McCann, the little British girl that went missing while her family was vacationing in Portugal. After months with few leads, Madeleine's mother began making statements not only about the lack of any kind of system in the Portuguese government for dealing with missing persons cases, but also extended that to her own home country. She blamed the Portuguese, and in extension, the entire European justice system for the lack of definitive results in the case, calling them "20 years behind the Americans."
I have never been the victim of a crime. I was never a criminal. But I have made, and continue to make, decisions that are technically illegal. And that is because I trust that our judicial system will recognize the fact that I am not a criminal, I am merely human. Yes I make occasional bad decisions, but doesn't everyone? This brings me back to Amanda Knox. Her alibi for the night that her roommate was murdered was that she was over at her boyfriends toking it up. What she was pretty much saying is that she does illegal things but is not a murderer or a criminal. Seems pretty logical? Yeah, the Italian courts didn't think so either.
Would the same thing that happened to Amanda in Italy happen in the U.S.? I honestly don't know. But what I do know is that Amanda would much rather be tried in an American court of law than an Italian one. As I am sure Devon and Madeline's parents would have preferred that they had gone missing in their home countries.
I for one would prefer to not ever be considered either a victim or a criminal. But if I was labeled either, I would want it to be in the U.S.
The point is, I am happy I am allowed to spit out my gum on the sidewalk (Singapore), or watch and read media from more than one source (China, etc.), or protest against something I believe to be wrong (Iran, etc). More than anything, I am grateful for my own ability to be a complete pain in the ass, to espouse Marxist ideology, or to believe and practice Scientology. And that is the glory of America--you can be all those things and still be "American" instead of a "enemy of the state." Isn't freedom beautiful?
Thursday, December 3, 2009
Drumroll please....
I am
NOT
going
to.....
TAIWAN.
Though I got offered a teaching job there. And I am sure it would have been great. But when it's not right, it's not right.
Plus I'd really miss these faces.

And these ones too.

So moving on to other decisions:
- Where to live when my contract ends in 2 weeks (better get a move on this one!)
- Where to go to Graduate school
- To take test prep or to not
- If I need to go back to school for classes (This might actually be fun, albeit expensive)
- If I should move and establish residency in CA. Hmm...beaches sound very tempting this time of year.
Sunday, November 22, 2009
Kelly's Quilts

Thursday, November 19, 2009
The Bloomsbury Cafe- I'm in book club heaven!
To start the club off, Alicia sent us a series of questions, the answers of which you can find below. After that we got our first reading assignment- Toni Morrison's A Mercy. My response to the book will be coming soon. For now, enjoy the reading below!
1. Name: Krystal Nanette Downs (http://krystaldowns.blogspot.com/
2. Favorite place you have lived: Camarillo, California
3. Place you would like to live if you could: Can I pick more than one? Ireland. Southern California. Italy.
4. What do you do when you aren't reading? I WORK. Right now I have a full-time job and and what feels like a full-time internship. When I have the occasional spare moment, I enjoy swimming, riding my bike, going to bookstores (that doesn't count right?), dancing, listening to a wide array of music, laying in the sun, meeting new people, traveling, watching trashy T.V. shows, and going to the beach if I'm near one.
5. 3 favorite films: Right now they are: Fargo, The Hours, The Departed
6. 3 favorite foods: Sushi, fruit, Indian
7. Major, specialty in major if any: English. Minors: sociology and women's studies
8. Favorite literary time period: Post-modern lit/post 1950's.
9. 3 favorite books and why: 3 favorites! Well if I have to choose...
God of Small Things by A. Roy. I read this book a long time ago, and so cannot completely explain why I love this book so much. I always loved the fairy tale type storytelling that one find in Indian literature, so I know that is part of it. I remember this book touching me on so many different levels. It was one of those books that stays with you long after you read the last line. I love Roy's language that seems playful and tragic. So many simple phrases knocked me down with their power. She breaks all the rules of language in all the right ways. Her moral judgements on her characters are clear and brutal. And her judgements on her readers are unbending; not once was I allowed to break free from her words and the critique behind them.
Here is an excerpt: "Perhaps it's true that things can change in a day. That a few dozen hours can affect the outcome of whole lifetimes. And that when they do, those few dozen hours, like the salvaged remains of a burned house---the charred clock, the singed photograph, the scorched furniture---must be resurrected from the ruins and examined. Preserved. Accounted for. Little events, ordinary things, smashed and reconstituted. Imbued with new meaning. Suddenly they become the bleached bones of a story." AWESOME!
Anna Karenina by Tolstoy
I took a Russian Literature class while at BYU and loved it. It gave me an excuse to read so many brilliant books. I had read Anna Karenina on my own before, but fell in love with it the second time around. The characters are all so hopeless; I wanted to shake them all and say look at what you're doing, ruining your life, for what? In this case, most of the characters are ruined because of love or at least what looks like love. My favorite character by far is Levin who is always searching for something, be it truth or love, and never can seem to find it.
His thoughts and speeches are so remarkably poignant, that when I was reading the novel I wanted to underline everything. That is how quotable Anna Karenina is.
Lolita by Nabakov
I know Alicia is squirming right now. I really do love this book though. Yes, the characters and themes are a little disturbing. But I love his writing more than almost anyone else I've read. I feel like each of Nabakov's sentences are words of poetry. He makes pedophilia, incest, and the most vile and disgusting sound and look beautiful. You can really see that he is a true master of language.
Just listen to his genius first lines: Lolita, light of my life, fire of my loins. My sin, my soul. Lo-lee-ta: the tip of the tongue taking a trip of three steps down the palate to tap, at three, on the teeth. Lo. Lee. Ta. She was Lo, plain Lo, in the morning, standing four feet ten in one sock. She was Lola in slacks. She was Dolly at school. She was Dolores on the dotted line. But in my arms she was always Lolita. Did she have a precursor? She did, indeed she did. In point of fact, there might have been no Lolita at all had I not loved, one summer, an initial girl-child. In a princedom by the sea. Oh when? About as many years before Lolita was born as my age was that summer. You can always count on a murderer for a fancy prose style. Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, exhibit number one is what the seraphs, the misinformed, simple, noble-winged seraphs, envied. Look at this tangle of thorns.
Nabokov would always tell people that he thought in images and that letters and words for him were colored (literally). Not surprising considering language like the above, no?
10. How do you like to approach literature? Do you have a particular reading strategy you usually employ? My inclinations push me towards a feminist approach, although I do think that if one is a true critical reader, one must look at literature from many, if not all, modes of reading. I also have a deep love of Marxist criticism. Down with the man!
One of the specific strategies I like to employ is a kind of reader response. If I find something profound, I highlight it. If I have a thought that needs out, I write it down in the margins. These notations often help me connect previous concepts to current and future themes.
11. What does literature "do" for you? Or in other words, why spend the time? My love of books began at a very early age. I used to love to read simply for the juvenile pleasure of it. Now that I am much older and wiser :) books mean so much more to me. Books make the world seem smaller, they make the differences between people seem insignificant. Reading connects me to experiences and feelings I might not have felt had it not been for a book or character. Literature pushes me to think critically, to challenge norms, to question authorities and truths. Literature makes the small things big. It makes me and you and everyone significant. It makes us all beautiful.
12. The really big question--how do you know Alicia? I met Alicia my Junior year of college (Fall 2006) when I moved into the condo at Victoria Place II. She was my room roommate. I was constantly amazed that I had got so lucky; we both got along extremely well, and were both English majors. She would give me advice about what professors to take classes from, and was continually encouraging me to be and do better. I really enjoyed being her roommate for that semester.
Sunday, November 15, 2009
On moving forward
Wednesday, November 4, 2009
What I have been working on

